Smark Out Moment

Welcome to the first edition of WRESTLING IS 20/20! This segment is a play off the phrase "hindsight is 20/20" wherein we'll be looking at something from the past in professional wrestling history and judging whether or not we would change anything if we knew then what we know now.

With the benefit of hindsight, would you alter the course of history, or leave everything the way it went down?

For this introductory entry, we'll be focusing on The Undertaker's undefeated streak from WrestleMania and its end when he lost to Brock Lesnar at WrestleMania 30.

Should that have happened, or should The Undertaker have won? If Taker should have lost at some point, who should have beaten him? Should he have never had a streak to begin with?